Cooling Inflation, Housing Weakness, Manufacturing Slump: The Fed’s Window to Act Is Now

 

A Timely Cut or a Dangerous Delay? Why the Fed Should Act in May

Over the past several months, the Federal Reserve has consistently maintained a cautious stance—signaling that any pivot toward easing would be based on clear, sustained evidence of disinflation and labor market stability. However, recent data releases have gradually painted a different picture: inflation is cooling, demand is softening, and forward-looking indicators are beginning to signal economic fatigue. At this stage, delaying monetary easing risks overshooting the policy tightening cycle and pushing the economy toward deflation—a far more dangerous scenario than the inflationary pressures the Fed originally aimed to tame.

Cooling Inflation Provides Breathing Room

The most recent inflation data has added substantial weight to the case for policy easing. Both the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) releases in April point to a continued trend of disinflation. Core CPI and PPI—measures that strip out volatile food and energy prices—showed restrained monthly increases, signaling that underlying inflationary momentum is waning.

Moreover, market-based inflation expectations are stabilizing. The five-year breakeven inflation rate has shown a modest decline, reflecting growing confidence that price pressures are under control. These dynamics provide the Fed with a window of opportunity to begin easing without risking a resurgence in inflation.

Demand Is Slowing Across Sectors

The evidence of weakening demand is also becoming more difficult to ignore. March retail sales were softer than expected, particularly within the Control Group—the segment of retail data that feeds directly into GDP calculations. A weak performance in this category typically signals that consumer spending, the backbone of the U.S. economy, is beginning to lose steam.

The housing sector, a particularly interest rate-sensitive component of the economy, also showed signs of deterioration. Housing Starts dropped sharply to 1.324 million in March, down from 1.494 million in February and well below the consensus of 1.42 million. Although Building Permits rose slightly, the net effect suggests developers are becoming more cautious amid a higher-rate environment.

Combined, these indicators paint a clear picture of a cooling domestic economy—one that may struggle under the weight of current monetary policy settings if no adjustments are made.

Manufacturing Data Reflects Deteriorating Outlook

Perhaps the most striking data point came from the April release of the Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index, which collapsed to -26.4 from 12.5 in March. This figure was not only far below the consensus expectation of +2.0 but represents one of the sharpest month-over-month declines in sentiment since the pandemic.

The Philly Fed Index, a forward-looking gauge of manufacturing activity in the Mid-Atlantic region, is often seen as an early indicator of broader industrial trends. A reading this low suggests not just a temporary slowdown, but potentially a more persistent contraction in the goods-producing sector. Such data further strengthens the case for an immediate reassessment of current policy tightness.

Labor Market Stability Removes Major Obstacle

One argument against a near-term rate cut has been the continued strength of the U.S. labor market. However, the latest weekly Initial Jobless Claims data shows that while job creation remains solid, it is not overheating. Claims for the week ending April 12 came in at 215,000—lower than both the prior week (224,000) and the consensus forecast (225,000).

Importantly, these figures indicate stability, not excess demand for labor. Wage pressures are not accelerating, and labor force participation remains relatively steady. From a policy standpoint, this removes a key obstacle: there is little evidence to suggest that cutting rates would reignite wage-driven inflation.

The ECB Has Already Taken the First Step

Adding a global dimension to the case for easing, the European Central Bank has already moved forward with a rate cut. On April 17, the ECB lowered its benchmark interest rate from 2.65% to 2.40%, in line with consensus expectations. The cut reflects not only declining inflation in the Eurozone but also a growing recognition that prolonged tight monetary policy risks stalling recovery altogether.

While the Federal Reserve is not obligated to mirror the ECB’s actions, it cannot operate in isolation. A divergence in policy paths could lead to further dollar appreciation, tightening global financial conditions, weakening U.S. exports, and importing additional disinflationary pressure. In this context, delaying a rate cut risks amplifying the very macroeconomic headwinds the Fed seeks to avoid.

The Risk of Overshooting Into Deflation

While inflation was the dominant concern of 2022 and 2023, the pendulum has now swung. If the Fed holds rates at current levels for too long, real interest rates (adjusted for inflation) will continue to rise. This would tighten financial conditions even further and risk pushing the economy into outright deflation—a far more dangerous and harder-to-reverse phenomenon.

Deflation increases the real burden of debt, discourages spending, and can entrench a negative economic feedback loop. Unlike inflation, which can be countered with higher rates, deflation requires aggressive easing and carries longer-term structural risks. By acting now, the Fed can preempt such risks while maintaining credibility in its dual mandate.

Timing Matters More Than Intentions

It is important to emphasize that a rate cut in May would not signal panic or policy failure—it would be a calibrated move grounded in the available data. The Fed has spent the past two years reinforcing its inflation-fighting credentials. Now that the data justifies a shift, the credibility built over that period gives it the flexibility to act preemptively.

Delaying action in hopes of gaining “more data” may ultimately be counterproductive. By the time confirmation arrives, the damage from delayed response may already be underway. The window for a soft landing is narrow, and it is closing fast.

Conclusion: Act Before It’s Too Late

The Federal Reserve now faces a critical decision. The combination of cooling inflation, weakening demand, deteriorating manufacturing sentiment, and a stable labor market all argue in favor of immediate easing. With the ECB already moving, and inflation risks abating, the Fed has both the cover and the imperative to begin cutting rates as early as May.

Waiting longer may provide more clarity, but it also increases the risk of policy inertia. A timely rate cut in May would not only support a soft landing but also prevent the far more dangerous outcome of deflation. The case is clear, the data is aligned, and the risks of inaction are growing. It is time to act.

Enjoyed this article?
Take your trading further with exclusive premium content, including stock picks, fundamental analysis, and DCF valuations — available to purchase individually.
👉 Darrisman's – Access the full content now!

Other related post

Mixed US Data Adds Slight Dovish Tilt Ahead of Powell Speech and Fed Policy Outlook

IEA Slashes Oil Demand Forecast Ahead of Key EIA Report: What It Means for Markets and Policy

Cooling Prices and Subdued Factory Activity Support a Dovish Fed Policy Path

 10-Year Treasury Yield at a Crossroads: Rebound or Reversal After Powell’s Wait-and-See Stance?